Apply policy
Unsupported, high-risk, or stale claims are flagged the same way on every account.
Policy appliedEvery buyer answer is provable, not fabricated.
AccountMade makes governance the default path, not an afterthought. Every claim traces to an approved source, gaps are flagged honestly instead of guessed, and the send gate holds until a reviewer signs off — whether the answer ships in a deck or a security questionnaire.
Rules decide what any buyer artifact is allowed to say.
Policies flag unsupported, high-risk, or stale claims automatically, so the standard for what can ship is applied the same way on every account — and on every surface a buyer sees.
Review in context
Each claim carries its source and risk, so sign-off is a real decision.
Reviewed in contextGate every surface
Only claims a source can back reach the deck, the RFP, the trust page, or the questionnaire answer.
Source-backed exportOne governed pipeline, source to send.
Every stage inherits the same approved evidence and reviewer state — nothing is rebuilt from memory.
- 01
Approved sources
The evidence teams already trust.
- 02
Governed claims
Each carries its source, risk, and reviewer.
- 03
Review & send gate
Unsupported language can't get through.
- 04
Buyer-ready deck
On-brand, source-backed, safe to send.
Claims are approved with their evidence in view.
Each claim carries its source, risk, and reviewer state. Owners resolve what's flagged in context instead of trusting that someone, somewhere, checked it.
- Policies flag unsupported, high-risk, or stale claims automatically.
- The same standard for what can ship applies to every account.
Only source-backed statements reach the buyer.
Export inherits reviewer state. A blocked claim can't reach a buyer, gaps are marked as gaps rather than invented, and every statement that ships traces back to the source that supports it.
- Every artifact inherits reviewer state — blocked claims can't reach a buyer.
- Every statement that ships traces back to the source behind it.
When a buyer's security review asks where a claim came from — in the deck or in the questionnaire — we have the source and the sign-off on the same record. That's the difference.