Sales enablement
Stores the files sales already wrote.
No generation, no governance, and nothing for the inbound questionnaire.
Deals don't die in the demo. They die where your answers stop matching.
The buyer's committee reads what sales pitched and what security attested — side by side, mid-deal. AccountMade builds both from one governed claim library, so they can't disagree, and every claim traces to an approved source.
Death by questionnaire is a real line item.
The pain isn't the pitch. It's the security review that stalls the deal after the yes.
20+ hrsa week
spent on vendor security questionnaires — a third of companies spend 30+.
Whistic, n=52469%of buyers
catch inconsistencies between what your site says and what your sellers say — and it costs the deal.
Gartner42%higher win
when the security review starts early, instead of stalling the deal at the finish line.
Conveyor, n=275+One library. Out and back.
What you send
- Pitch deck
- One-pager & proposal
- Trust page
Your claim libraryApproved. Sourced. Reusable.
What they send back
- Security questionnaire
- RFP / RFI
Approve a claim once. Everything a buyer reads — in or out — derives from it, so nothing you pitch can contradict what you attest.
Everyone governs one surface. We cross the seam.
Each incumbent owns one side of the deal. The gap between them is where deals die — and it's the one place none of them can reach.
Questionnaire / RFP tools
Answer the inbound form.
Siloed from the pitch, enterprise-priced, and built to assume you have a team.
Trust centers
Publish one security page.
Not a sales tool — no deck, no proposal, no answered questionnaire.
AI deck / doc tools
Generate fast.
No approved source behind a word — the exact slop these buyers punish.
Built for the seller who gets enterprise demands without an enterprise back office.
No GRC desk, no RFP team, no enablement org — just you and a deal that suddenly needs a security questionnaire answered by Monday. Answer enterprise buyers like a 500-person company, with the back office of a 5-person one.
Provable beats polished.
For a security or procurement reviewer, over-produced decks read as less credible. What earns the yes is a claim they can trace, an honest gap instead of a guess, and answers that hold up against everything else you've sent.
See how governance works- Every claim traces to a sourceNothing buyer-facing ships that a reviewer can't verify.
- Honest gaps, never guessesAn unanswered question gets flagged for review — a flagged gap reads as more credible than a plausible bluff.
- Consistent across every surfaceThe deck, the document, and the questionnaire answer all derive from the same approved claims.