
Three reusable deck structures
Illustrative worked example. Names, volumes, dates, and outcomes are fictional; replace them with approved evidence before use.
| Use case | Slide sequence | Concrete decision |
|---|---|---|
| Technical fit | Current workflow → system boundary → integration flow → limits → test plan | Can the product read approved records without changing the ledger? |
| Security review | Data map → identity model → access events → response process → review requests | Can the security lead assess the pilot boundary? |
| Business approval | Baseline → options → cost assumptions → POC result → decision request | Should the team fund the next phase? |
Sources: Supabase product documentation · Supabase: securing data
A seven-slide technical evaluation deck
Illustrative worked example. Names, volumes, dates, and outcomes are fictional; replace them with approved evidence before use.
Slide 1: ‘Exception evidence retrieval for finance operations’ defines the decision: can analysts investigate 30 selected exceptions without manual exports? Slide 2 maps the current CSV handoff and names the controller. Slide 3 shows a read-only connector, workspace role, and audit record. Slide 4 lists prerequisites: export access, retention decision, and sandbox owner. Slide 5 defines the pass result: 28 of 30 records link to the correct source. Slide 6 records limits: no ledger writes, no production rollout, and no regional-storage conclusion. Slide 7 requests approval for a ten-business-day pilot and names the test owners.
Sources: Supabase: securing data
Real vendor documentation to use as technical references
These are real vendor documentation pages, not sales decks. WorkOS documents Directory Sync as a connection to directory providers that can report user, group, and access-rule changes. Supabase documents product areas and security patterns such as row-level access policies. Vercel documents access choices for protected deployment URLs. A technical deck can link to this type of primary material when a reviewer needs detail beyond the slide.
Sources: WorkOS Directory Sync documentation · Supabase product documentation · Supabase: securing data · Vercel Deployment Protection
Review before sending
- Label estimates and scenarios.
- Show data direction and the system boundary on every architecture diagram.
- Name the recipient’s next decision and owner.
- State the material limits of the proposed evaluation.
Sources and dates
- Accountmade: buyer-content continuity ↗
Product-oriented background on durable, reviewable sales material.
Reviewed 2026-09-08 - WorkOS Directory Sync documentation ↗
Describes directory-provider connections and directory events.
Reviewed 2026-09-08 - Supabase product documentation ↗
Official overview of Database, Auth, Storage, Realtime, and Edge Functions.
Reviewed 2026-09-08 - Supabase: securing data ↗
Official guidance on RLS and server-side access patterns.
Reviewed 2026-09-08 - Vercel Deployment Protection ↗
Official documentation for protecting preview and production URLs.
Reviewed 2026-09-08
Found an error or a changed source? Send a correction.
Apply this to your company
Prepare materials for your next buyer conversation.
Accountmade helps technical B2B teams prepare demo decks, technical blueprints, business cases and security materials.
Explore Accountmade →