Technical sales deck: three structures, one example

Three reusable deck structures

Illustrative example. Names, volumes, dates and outcomes are fictional; replace them with approved evidence before use.

Sources: Supabase product documentation · Supabase: securing data

A seven-slide technical evaluation deck

Illustrative example. Names, volumes, dates and outcomes are fictional; replace them with approved evidence before use.

Slide 1: ‘Exception evidence retrieval for finance operations’ defines the decision: can analysts investigate 30 selected exceptions without manual exports? Slide 2 maps the current CSV handoff and names the controller.

Slide 3 shows a read-only connector, workspace role, and audit record. Slide 4 lists prerequisites: export access, retention decision, and sandbox owner. Slide 5 defines the pass result: 28 of 30 records link to the correct source.

Slide 6 records limits: no ledger writes, no production rollout, and no regional-storage conclusion. Slide 7 requests approval for a ten-business-day pilot and names the test owners.

Sources: Supabase: securing data

Real vendor documentation to use as technical references

These are real vendor documentation pages, not sales decks. WorkOS documents Directory Sync as a connection to directory providers that report user, group and access-rule changes.

Supabase documents product areas and security patterns such as row-level access policies. Vercel documents access choices for protected deployment URLs. Link to primary material like this when a reviewer needs detail beyond the slide.

Sources: WorkOS Directory Sync documentation · Supabase product documentation · Supabase: securing data · Vercel Deployment Protection

Review before sending

• Label estimates and scenarios.
• Show data direction and the system boundary on every architecture diagram.
• Name the recipient’s next decision and owner.
• State the material limits of the proposed evaluation.

Sources: AccountMade blog: keeping buyer content traceable